Incendium Amoris



"But I haven't lost the demons' craft and cunning: I've inherited
from them some useful things, but they won't be used for their benefit!"


--Robert de Boron, Merlin

Name:
Location: Ontario, Canada

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Evisceration

To our professor's chagrin last semester in Shakespeare class, our essays, or at least the majority must have been rather poor in textual analysis but rich with skimming paraphrases and assumptions. Instead of asking us to write a ten-page essay on a general thematic issue in one play, he's asked us to analyse two speeches from Coriolanus and Troilus and Cressida, the first one being when Martius first eviscerates the First Citizens, and the second where Thersites satirises Achilles and Patroclus and Agamemnon but most of all, Menelaus. The only requirement for this assigment is we focus on the language itself, not what we think we already know, but what is written on the page.

Here is my attempt, flawed and teeming with errors as it is.

3 Comments:

Blogger Dr J said...

Interesting, Davyth, but I wonder about your concluding sentence, because it seems to privilege Coriolanus in a way that seems awkward, given that there are darker and much more nihilistic failures of efficacy in King Lear and Macbeth. I'd suggest that Lear's "Never, never, never..." or Macbeth's "There would have been time for such a word" cast matters in much starker relief. What do you think?

(Alas, you can take the boy out of the Shakespeare class, but not the Shakespeare class out of the boy.)

7:11 AM  
Blogger Davyth said...

It is a bit of a gross hyperbole and over-generalization now that you mention it. Even in the context of the paper--use of language, warfare, character--I should have been more succint, and less careless with my language.

My idea of the 'demonic'--as I should have mentioned in the paper--is almost directly taken from Northrop Frye in The Great Code as a way of contrasting the redemptive quality of Thersites' words compared to Coriolanus' grating, aggrandizing use of language.

4:10 PM  
Blogger Davyth said...

There is a savage ferocity to Coriolanus, at least when I read the play, especially in the passage our professor selected, which few other characters--besides villains like Aaron, Iago and Edmund--can rival. I think (however naively it sounds) that is the quiddity (or contradiction) of Coriolanus' character: he has the menace (and language) of a villain yet he has the stature and flaws of a tragic hero.

7:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home